Saturday September 04 2010


FREE Magazine Subscription
Highlights of Next Issue
Golden Gas Awards 2010 Winners
G & I Connect
Magazine Articles
2010 Media Guide
Contact Us
Home Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Subscribe to receive more articles like this: Print/digital

A Comparative Analysis of the Errors in the Measurement of Oxygen Between the In-Situ and Extractive Methods
By James Hobby, Ian Gaskin, Richard Kovacich, Martin Lopez, Bahram Alizadeh
July/August 2010

A discussion of measurement errors in addition to any standard performance errors or specifications listed by the suppliers showing why in-situ and extractive options both remain important for the effective measurement of gas composition.

Introduction
The measurement of the concentration of oxygen is a critical factor in the control of many processes. The emergence of new techniques for in-situ oxygen measurement has extended the range of methods available to the user. However, to date there has been limited analysis of the actual errors present for both in-situ and traditional extractive methods. This paper explores the major contributory errors present in both cases, providing an increased understanding of the capabilities of the available techniques to users interested in the selection of oxygen analyzers.

To read the entire article, sign up for a free subscription and then click on
Click here for the digital edition of the current issue



FREE Magazine Subscription | Magazine Articles | 2009 Media Guide
Shows, Conferences & Events | Product News | Industry News
Contact Gases & Instrumentation | Home

 
 
 

 

 


Copyright © 2010 MetaWord, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy